Selection Criteria

Our transparent evaluation process ensures fair and merit-based recognition of excellence.

Evaluation Framework

All nominations are evaluated against a comprehensive framework designed to identify true excellence and impact in cybersecurity. Our judges assess each nomination across four key dimensions:

Criterion Description Weight
Impact Measurable contribution to cybersecurity, scope of influence, and benefit to the broader community 30%
Innovation Novel approaches, creative problem-solving, and advancement of the field 25%
Leadership Influence on peers and industry, mentorship, and thought leadership 25%
Consistency Sustained excellence over time, track record, and ongoing commitment 20%

Selection Process

Our multi-stage selection process ensures thorough evaluation and consensus among expert judges:

  1. Nomination Review: All nominations are screened for completeness and eligibility. Incomplete or ineligible nominations are flagged for follow-up or rejection.
  2. Initial Scoring: Each eligible nomination is independently scored by at least two judges using our evaluation framework.
  3. Shortlist Discussion: Top-scoring nominations are discussed in panel meetings. Judges debate merits and reach consensus on finalists.
  4. Finalist Verification: Background checks and reference verification are conducted for all finalists to ensure accuracy of claims.
  5. Final Deliberation: The full jury panel reviews all finalists and selects winners through consensus voting.
  6. Winner Notification: Winners are notified confidentially before public announcement at the awards ceremony.

Jury Panel

Our distinguished jury comprises senior leaders from across the cybersecurity ecosystem:

Industry Leaders

CISOs and security executives from leading organizations who bring practical perspective on leadership and impact.

Academic Experts

Professors and researchers from top institutions who evaluate technical innovation and research contributions.

Community Representatives

Leaders of security communities and organizations who assess community impact and outreach efforts.

Previous Winners

Past award recipients who understand excellence and can identify outstanding achievements.

Note: Jury members recuse themselves from evaluating nominations from their own organizations or where conflicts of interest exist.

Nomination Tips

To maximize your nomination's chances of success:

  • 01 Be Specific: Provide concrete examples, metrics, and evidence of achievements.
  • 02 Focus on Impact: Emphasize outcomes and benefits, not just activities.
  • 03 Include References: Provide contact details of people who can vouch for the nominee.
  • 04 Add Evidence: Include links to publications, projects, or media coverage.
  • 05 Match the Category: Ensure the nomination fits the specific award criteria.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I nominate myself?

Yes, self-nominations are accepted and encouraged. Many successful nominations are self-submitted. The evaluation process is the same regardless of who submits the nomination.

Can one person be nominated for multiple awards?

Yes, if a person qualifies for multiple categories, they can be nominated for each. However, we recommend focusing on the category where they have the strongest candidacy.

What happens if my nomination is not selected?

All nominations remain confidential. Non-selected nominees are welcome to reapply in future years. We encourage building on achievements and resubmitting with updated information.

Are there any fees for nomination?

No, nominations are completely free. There are no charges at any stage of the process. We believe recognition should be based purely on merit.

Do winners need to attend the ceremony?

Winners are strongly encouraged to attend. If unable to attend, winners can designate a representative to accept on their behalf, or the award can be shipped.

Submit Nomination